Skip to main content

It's not about one book, it's about language

The vast amount of bombings and shootings that have happened recently,(Baghdad, Paris, Beirut), have been affecting me. I have trouble dealing with problems that are unsolvable. Probably part of the reason I enjoyed House M.D. so much.

I woke up on November 18, 2015 and realized that the problem isn't about any specific book. I believe it is, in part, about language. Not a specific one, but human language altogether.

From what I understand, most holy books are guides to being good people. There is a fundamental problem in how they depart that knowledge. Those guiding principles are open to interpretation. People will interpret them how it makes sense to their lives rather than know explicitly what it means.

Thou shall not kill.

Orthodox Buddhists view this as anything. Don't kill humans, ants, ladybugs, mice, etc. They don't eat meat either.

For the rest of us who do eat meat, we might wonder if we are already doomed to hell, yet our Creator made us omnivores. This may be news for some, but eating meat is okay as a Buddhist as long as the animal wasn't expressly killed for you.

There's also radical Buddhists. They kill people just like every other radical group.

It's not just our holy books that have this language issue. It can be seen in the U.S. Second Amendment right to carry guns. What was their intention? Did they mean everyone can carry a gun everywhere? Did they mean one can have a gun at home for self and property defense? Did they mean everyone has the right to the arms of a bear?

I'm spiritual, not religious. I see a lot of issues blamed on a specific book by one group while their book is just as ambiguous.

People will use whatever they can to rationalize behaviour that is horrid if it's in line with their goals. They will say a book said it was okay. They also argue that the book filled with stories is factual and to question it is to question all human existence.

I guess that's scary for people to realize. These holy books were all written by humans with agendas of their own.

I guess other things too.

If a bee stings me, did I kill it or did it commit suicide? Perhaps I angered or startled it. It reacts instinctively. I react that way when a spider intrudes upon my shower.

One of the things I love about language is that it can be perceived in multiple ways. I love subtext and depth. I wonder though if it has no business being in a holy book. Is this the root of the problem?

What if one book was written to guide humanity as a whole? It could take good lessons from every holy book. But put them into this new book with clean, clear language explicitly detailing the acceptable range of behaviour. It would need to be written by the foremost technical writers and probably lawyers.

Some are likely cringing that I brought lawyers into this. Contracts are often hard to understand and a lot of people feel cheated by one in a divorce situation. Here's the thing. Lawyers are good at addressing every scenario. The technical writers will ensure the language isn't convoluted.

It could also be updated as necessary to ensure it is accurate and covers all it should.

But I also worry there are more sinister issues lurking. Racism, greed, fascism. Some people simply want to exert control over others rather than let them live happily. We can see this in workplaces. One might have a boss that cares more about following orders than getting the work done. Or constantly changes performance targets. We see it in abusive relationships. "You know that one friend of yours? I don't like them. So you can't like them anymore either." The mean teacher who constantly yells at his/her students. Or the teacher who needs to have one student they ride all semester. And obviously dictators. Often the delivery of food and other items to their country's poorest is blocked or stolen. It's not that people aren't giving. There's a roadblock because someone feels a need to control. In Mad Max, the water was used to exert control over the masses. Some people use access to their bodies, sex, to control their partner. They'll do this in platonic ways as well by threatening to leave.

Who gets to decide what is acceptable behaviour? I don't want the responsibility of that on my shoulders. But I still think something has to be done before we lead the human race to extinction.

I don't pretend to have the answers. I just have a lot of questions.

Ciao,
R~

Popular posts from this blog

The Gauntlet That Was October

I had a lot of things happen in October. I watched Frankenstein in the cemetery with friends. I had tea with a friend. I started a new sport: curling. This is really fun and I'm enjoying the level of activity it provides and all the strategic elements. I'll do a separate post on it soon. Unfortunately, soon after my first game, I came down with Covid and so did the friend who I had tea with, so I think we both caught it at the place we went to. That wasn't fun. I already posted about that. I was fortunate to be free of it in time to attend Can-Con where I took in lots of panels, saw some of the wonderful writer community, bought many new books, and volunteered to help out in the rooms. The following weekend, I went to the livestream for Danielle Allard's new album release, followed by the in person release. As part of this, she has a 6 video series that releases every Sunday on her YouTube at 1:15 PM EDT. Video number 2, Falling Into Place, is one that I feel fortunate

Frisky Friday - Maple Syrup Porn

[caption id="attachment_10523" align="alignright" width="300"] Image created using Bitmoji[/caption] While delving into some Canadian film history this week, I learned that there is a thing called Maple Syrup Porn. I laughed when I read the term. I thought, "Is our adult film industry really called Maple Syrup Porn?" It's not. Some is Canadian, but it mostly refers to getting around censorship of sex. It was not only common in Quebec due to religion, but several places in the US. You can read more about it here . If you're looking to heat things up this weekend, consider a sweet old film from the early days of the sexual revolution. Maybe even drizzle a little syrup on your partner ;) Guid cheerio the nou, R~

On Edge - ROW80 R1-16

This sounds superstitious, but the fact that this is Leap Year has me on edge. Why? The last two have been rather difficult for me. In 2012, my work place was being divested and I was working multiple job roles because of all the people who had left. My marriage also ended. This led to a major life change, which included moving to Ottawa. I love Ottawa, so at least that worked out. The rest was hard. In 2016, I was restructured out of my job. This led to me floating about for a while on EI as I tried to figure out my future, trying some things like Copywriting out, and going back to school for screenwriting. After school, it took time to find work and I almost lost my home and car in the process. Scary stuff. It's now 2020 and I have a full-time permanent job again, but I'm filling multiple job roles because we're short-handed. We're also so far into year end that it's hard to train the person who is learning to be me for one of those roles. I'm just hopin